The Global Warming Fraud

While demagogue Al Gore declares the debate over and wacky-do greenies claim unanimous scientific consensus on global warming, some six hundred fifty scientists have not gotten the word that anthropogenic global warming is their gospel. They are currently challenging the UN's orthodoxy on global warming at a conference going on now in Poland. The opinions of the dissenters is featured in a newly updated U.S. Senate Minority Report:

Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever:
“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.”

Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson:
"Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.”

UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, PhD environmental physical chemist:
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”

Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet:
“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.”

Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico:
The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.”

U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA:
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”

Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ:
“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.”

Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs:
“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.”

Geologist Dr. David Gee, Uppsala University, Sweden:
“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?"

Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee:
“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”

Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh:
“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.”

Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal:
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.”

Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research, Chubu University, Japan:
“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.”

Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, University of La Plata:
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.”